6 files changed, 211 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

M .agents/skills/gstack-plan-ceo-review/SKILL.md
M .agents/skills/gstack-retro/SKILL.md
M CHANGELOG.md
M VERSION
M plan-ceo-review/SKILL.md
M plan-ceo-review/SKILL.md.tmpl

@@ 324,6 324,21 @@ DESIGN=$(ls -t ~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG/*-$BRANCH-design-*.md 2>/dev/null | head
 ```
 If a design doc exists (from `/office-hours`), read it. Use it as the source of truth for the problem statement, constraints, and chosen approach. If it has a `Supersedes:` field, note that this is a revised design.
 
+**Handoff note check** (reuses $SLUG and $BRANCH from the design doc check above):
+```bash
+HANDOFF=$(ls -t ~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG/*-$BRANCH-ceo-handoff-*.md 2>/dev/null | head -1)
+[ -n "$HANDOFF" ] && echo "HANDOFF_FOUND: $HANDOFF" || echo "NO_HANDOFF"
+```
+If this block runs in a separate shell from the design doc check, recompute $SLUG and $BRANCH first using the same commands from that block.
+If a handoff note is found: read it. This contains system audit findings and discussion
+from a prior CEO review session that paused so the user could run `/office-hours`. Use it
+as additional context alongside the design doc. The handoff note helps you avoid re-asking
+questions the user already answered. Do NOT skip any steps — run the full review, but use
+the handoff note to inform your analysis and avoid redundant questions.
+
+Tell the user: "Found a handoff note from your prior CEO review session. I'll use that
+context to pick up where we left off."
+
 ## Prerequisite Skill Offer
 
 When the design doc check above prints "No design doc found," offer the prerequisite


@@ 343,6 358,39 @@ Options:
 If they skip: "No worries — standard review. If you ever want sharper input, try
 /office-hours first next time." Then proceed normally. Do not re-offer later in the session.
 
+**Handoff note save (BENEFITS_FROM):** If the user chose A (run /office-hours first),
+save a handoff context note before they leave. Reuse $SLUG and $BRANCH from the
+design doc check block above (they use the same `remote-slug || basename` fallback
+that handles repos without an origin remote). Then run:
+```bash
+mkdir -p ~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG
+USER=$(whoami)
+DATETIME=$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S)
+```
+Write to `~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG/$USER-$BRANCH-ceo-handoff-$DATETIME.md`:
+```markdown
+# CEO Review Handoff Note
+
+Generated by /plan-ceo-review on {date}
+Branch: {branch}
+Repo: {owner/repo}
+
+## Why I paused
+User chose to run /office-hours first (no design doc found).
+
+## System Audit Summary
+{Summarize what the system audit found — recent git history, diff scope,
+CLAUDE.md key points, TODOS.md relevant items, known pain points}
+
+## Discussion So Far
+{Empty — handoff happened before Step 0. Frontend/UI scope detection has not
+run yet — it will be assessed when the review resumes.}
+```
+
+Tell the user: "Context saved. Run /office-hours in another window. When you come back
+and invoke /plan-ceo-review, I'll pick up the context automatically — including the
+design doc /office-hours produces."
+
 **Mid-session detection:** During Step 0A (Premise Challenge), if the user can't
 articulate the problem, keeps changing the problem statement, answers with "I'm not
 sure," or is clearly exploring rather than reviewing — offer `/office-hours`:


@@ 355,6 403,15 @@ sure," or is clearly exploring rather than reviewing — offer `/office-hours`:
 Options: A) Yes, run /office-hours first. B) No, keep going.
 If they keep going, proceed normally — no guilt, no re-asking.
 
+**Handoff note save (mid-session):** If the user chose A (run /office-hours first from
+mid-session detection), save a handoff context note with the same format above, but
+include any Step 0A progress in the "Discussion So Far" section — premises discussed,
+problem framing attempts, user answers so far. Use the same bash block to generate the
+file path.
+
+Tell the user: "Context saved with your discussion so far. Run /office-hours, then
+come back to /plan-ceo-review."
+
 When reading TODOS.md, specifically:
 * Note any TODOs this plan touches, blocks, or unlocks
 * Check if deferred work from prior reviews relates to this plan


@@ 942,6 999,16 @@ List every ASCII diagram in files this plan touches. Still accurate?
 ### Unresolved Decisions
 If any AskUserQuestion goes unanswered, note it here. Never silently default.
 
+## Handoff Note Cleanup
+
+After producing the Completion Summary, clean up any handoff notes for this branch —
+the review is complete and the context is no longer needed.
+
+```bash
+source <(~/.codex/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-slug 2>/dev/null)
+rm -f ~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG/*-$BRANCH-ceo-handoff-*.md 2>/dev/null || true
+```
+
 ## Review Log
 
 After producing the Completion Summary above, persist the review result.

@@ 428,7 428,7 @@ From commit diffs, estimate PR sizes and bucket them:
 - **Small** (<100 LOC)
 - **Medium** (100-500 LOC)
 - **Large** (500-1500 LOC)
-- **XL** (1500+ LOC) — flag these with file counts
+- **XL** (1500+ LOC)
 
 ### Step 8: Focus Score + Ship of the Week
 


@@ 620,14 620,13 @@ Narrative interpreting what the team-wide patterns mean:
 
 Narrative covering:
 - Commit type mix and what it reveals
-- PR size discipline (are PRs staying small?)
+- PR size distribution and what it reveals about shipping cadence
 - Fix-chain detection (sequences of fix commits on the same subsystem)
 - Version bump discipline
 
 ### Code Quality Signals
 - Test LOC ratio trend
 - Hotspot analysis (are the same files churning?)
-- Any XL PRs that should have been split
 - Greptile signal ratio and trend (if history exists): "Greptile: X% signal (Y valid catches, Z false positives)"
 
 ### Test Health


@@ 666,7 665,7 @@ For each teammate (sorted by commits descending), write a section:
   - "Fixed the N+1 query that was causing 2s load times on the dashboard"
 - **Opportunity for growth**: 1 specific, constructive suggestion. Frame as investment, not criticism. Examples:
   - "Test coverage on the payment module is at 8% — worth investing in before the next feature lands on top of it"
-  - "3 of the 5 PRs were 800+ LOC — breaking these up would catch issues earlier and make review easier"
+  - "Most commits land in a single burst — spacing work across the day could reduce context-switching fatigue"
   - "All commits land between 1-4am — sustainable pace matters for code quality long-term"
 
 **AI collaboration note:** If many commits have `Co-Authored-By` AI trailers (e.g., Claude, Copilot), note the AI-assisted commit percentage as a team metric. Frame it neutrally — "N% of commits were AI-assisted" — without judgment.

@@ 1,5 1,11 @@
 # Changelog
 
+## [0.9.5.0] - 2026-03-21 — CEO Review ↔ Office Hours Chaining
+
+### Added
+
+- **CEO review saves context when handing off to `/office-hours`.** When `/plan-ceo-review` suggests running `/office-hours` first, it now saves a handoff note with your system audit findings and any discussion so far. When you come back and re-invoke `/plan-ceo-review`, it picks up that context automatically — no more starting from scratch.
+
 ## [0.9.4.1] - 2026-03-20
 
 ### Changed

@@ 1,1 1,1 @@
-0.9.4.1
+0.9.5.0

@@ 332,6 332,21 @@ DESIGN=$(ls -t ~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG/*-$BRANCH-design-*.md 2>/dev/null | head
 ```
 If a design doc exists (from `/office-hours`), read it. Use it as the source of truth for the problem statement, constraints, and chosen approach. If it has a `Supersedes:` field, note that this is a revised design.
 
+**Handoff note check** (reuses $SLUG and $BRANCH from the design doc check above):
+```bash
+HANDOFF=$(ls -t ~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG/*-$BRANCH-ceo-handoff-*.md 2>/dev/null | head -1)
+[ -n "$HANDOFF" ] && echo "HANDOFF_FOUND: $HANDOFF" || echo "NO_HANDOFF"
+```
+If this block runs in a separate shell from the design doc check, recompute $SLUG and $BRANCH first using the same commands from that block.
+If a handoff note is found: read it. This contains system audit findings and discussion
+from a prior CEO review session that paused so the user could run `/office-hours`. Use it
+as additional context alongside the design doc. The handoff note helps you avoid re-asking
+questions the user already answered. Do NOT skip any steps — run the full review, but use
+the handoff note to inform your analysis and avoid redundant questions.
+
+Tell the user: "Found a handoff note from your prior CEO review session. I'll use that
+context to pick up where we left off."
+
 ## Prerequisite Skill Offer
 
 When the design doc check above prints "No design doc found," offer the prerequisite


@@ 351,6 366,39 @@ Options:
 If they skip: "No worries — standard review. If you ever want sharper input, try
 /office-hours first next time." Then proceed normally. Do not re-offer later in the session.
 
+**Handoff note save (BENEFITS_FROM):** If the user chose A (run /office-hours first),
+save a handoff context note before they leave. Reuse $SLUG and $BRANCH from the
+design doc check block above (they use the same `remote-slug || basename` fallback
+that handles repos without an origin remote). Then run:
+```bash
+mkdir -p ~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG
+USER=$(whoami)
+DATETIME=$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S)
+```
+Write to `~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG/$USER-$BRANCH-ceo-handoff-$DATETIME.md`:
+```markdown
+# CEO Review Handoff Note
+
+Generated by /plan-ceo-review on {date}
+Branch: {branch}
+Repo: {owner/repo}
+
+## Why I paused
+User chose to run /office-hours first (no design doc found).
+
+## System Audit Summary
+{Summarize what the system audit found — recent git history, diff scope,
+CLAUDE.md key points, TODOS.md relevant items, known pain points}
+
+## Discussion So Far
+{Empty — handoff happened before Step 0. Frontend/UI scope detection has not
+run yet — it will be assessed when the review resumes.}
+```
+
+Tell the user: "Context saved. Run /office-hours in another window. When you come back
+and invoke /plan-ceo-review, I'll pick up the context automatically — including the
+design doc /office-hours produces."
+
 **Mid-session detection:** During Step 0A (Premise Challenge), if the user can't
 articulate the problem, keeps changing the problem statement, answers with "I'm not
 sure," or is clearly exploring rather than reviewing — offer `/office-hours`:


@@ 363,6 411,15 @@ sure," or is clearly exploring rather than reviewing — offer `/office-hours`:
 Options: A) Yes, run /office-hours first. B) No, keep going.
 If they keep going, proceed normally — no guilt, no re-asking.
 
+**Handoff note save (mid-session):** If the user chose A (run /office-hours first from
+mid-session detection), save a handoff context note with the same format above, but
+include any Step 0A progress in the "Discussion So Far" section — premises discussed,
+problem framing attempts, user answers so far. Use the same bash block to generate the
+file path.
+
+Tell the user: "Context saved with your discussion so far. Run /office-hours, then
+come back to /plan-ceo-review."
+
 When reading TODOS.md, specifically:
 * Note any TODOs this plan touches, blocks, or unlocks
 * Check if deferred work from prior reviews relates to this plan


@@ 950,6 1007,16 @@ List every ASCII diagram in files this plan touches. Still accurate?
 ### Unresolved Decisions
 If any AskUserQuestion goes unanswered, note it here. Never silently default.
 
+## Handoff Note Cleanup
+
+After producing the Completion Summary, clean up any handoff notes for this branch —
+the review is complete and the context is no longer needed.
+
+```bash
+source <(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-slug 2>/dev/null)
+rm -f ~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG/*-$BRANCH-ceo-handoff-*.md 2>/dev/null || true
+```
+
 ## Review Log
 
 After producing the Completion Summary above, persist the review result.

@@ 111,8 111,56 @@ DESIGN=$(ls -t ~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG/*-$BRANCH-design-*.md 2>/dev/null | head
 ```
 If a design doc exists (from `/office-hours`), read it. Use it as the source of truth for the problem statement, constraints, and chosen approach. If it has a `Supersedes:` field, note that this is a revised design.
 
+**Handoff note check** (reuses $SLUG and $BRANCH from the design doc check above):
+```bash
+HANDOFF=$(ls -t ~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG/*-$BRANCH-ceo-handoff-*.md 2>/dev/null | head -1)
+[ -n "$HANDOFF" ] && echo "HANDOFF_FOUND: $HANDOFF" || echo "NO_HANDOFF"
+```
+If this block runs in a separate shell from the design doc check, recompute $SLUG and $BRANCH first using the same commands from that block.
+If a handoff note is found: read it. This contains system audit findings and discussion
+from a prior CEO review session that paused so the user could run `/office-hours`. Use it
+as additional context alongside the design doc. The handoff note helps you avoid re-asking
+questions the user already answered. Do NOT skip any steps — run the full review, but use
+the handoff note to inform your analysis and avoid redundant questions.
+
+Tell the user: "Found a handoff note from your prior CEO review session. I'll use that
+context to pick up where we left off."
+
 {{BENEFITS_FROM}}
 
+**Handoff note save (BENEFITS_FROM):** If the user chose A (run /office-hours first),
+save a handoff context note before they leave. Reuse $SLUG and $BRANCH from the
+design doc check block above (they use the same `remote-slug || basename` fallback
+that handles repos without an origin remote). Then run:
+```bash
+mkdir -p ~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG
+USER=$(whoami)
+DATETIME=$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S)
+```
+Write to `~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG/$USER-$BRANCH-ceo-handoff-$DATETIME.md`:
+```markdown
+# CEO Review Handoff Note
+
+Generated by /plan-ceo-review on {date}
+Branch: {branch}
+Repo: {owner/repo}
+
+## Why I paused
+User chose to run /office-hours first (no design doc found).
+
+## System Audit Summary
+{Summarize what the system audit found — recent git history, diff scope,
+CLAUDE.md key points, TODOS.md relevant items, known pain points}
+
+## Discussion So Far
+{Empty — handoff happened before Step 0. Frontend/UI scope detection has not
+run yet — it will be assessed when the review resumes.}
+```
+
+Tell the user: "Context saved. Run /office-hours in another window. When you come back
+and invoke /plan-ceo-review, I'll pick up the context automatically — including the
+design doc /office-hours produces."
+
 **Mid-session detection:** During Step 0A (Premise Challenge), if the user can't
 articulate the problem, keeps changing the problem statement, answers with "I'm not
 sure," or is clearly exploring rather than reviewing — offer `/office-hours`:


@@ 125,6 173,15 @@ sure," or is clearly exploring rather than reviewing — offer `/office-hours`:
 Options: A) Yes, run /office-hours first. B) No, keep going.
 If they keep going, proceed normally — no guilt, no re-asking.
 
+**Handoff note save (mid-session):** If the user chose A (run /office-hours first from
+mid-session detection), save a handoff context note with the same format above, but
+include any Step 0A progress in the "Discussion So Far" section — premises discussed,
+problem framing attempts, user answers so far. Use the same bash block to generate the
+file path.
+
+Tell the user: "Context saved with your discussion so far. Run /office-hours, then
+come back to /plan-ceo-review."
+
 When reading TODOS.md, specifically:
 * Note any TODOs this plan touches, blocks, or unlocks
 * Check if deferred work from prior reviews relates to this plan


@@ 652,6 709,16 @@ List every ASCII diagram in files this plan touches. Still accurate?
 ### Unresolved Decisions
 If any AskUserQuestion goes unanswered, note it here. Never silently default.
 
+## Handoff Note Cleanup
+
+After producing the Completion Summary, clean up any handoff notes for this branch —
+the review is complete and the context is no longer needed.
+
+```bash
+source <(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-slug 2>/dev/null)
+rm -f ~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG/*-$BRANCH-ceo-handoff-*.md 2>/dev/null || true
+```
+
 ## Review Log
 
 After producing the Completion Summary above, persist the review result.