feat: add trigger phrases to skill descriptions for better model matching (v0.6.4.1) (#169)
* feat: add trigger phrases to skill descriptions for better model matching
Anthropic's skill best practices: "the description field is not a summary —
it's when to trigger." Add explicit "Use when asked to..." phrases to 12 skill
descriptions so Claude's auto-discovery works with natural language requests
like "deploy this" or "check my diff", not just explicit /slash-commands.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: add on-demand hooks and telemetry to TODOS.md
Captures two ideas from Anthropic's skill best practices post:
- /careful, /freeze, /guard on-demand hook skills (P3)
- Skill usage telemetry via preamble JSONL append (P3)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* chore: bump version and changelog (v0.6.4.1)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: exclude internal details from CHANGELOG style guide
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
feat: interactive /plan-design-review + CEO invokes designer + 100% coverage (v0.6.4) (#149)
* refactor: rename qa-design-review → design-review
The "qa-" prefix was confusing — this is the live-site design audit with
fix loop, not a QA-only report. Rename directory and update all references
across docs, tests, scripts, and skill templates.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* feat: interactive /plan-design-review + CEO invokes designer
Rewrite /plan-design-review from report-only grading to an interactive
plan-fixer that rates each design dimension 0-10, explains what a 10
looks like, and edits the plan to get there. Parallel structure with
/plan-ceo-review and /plan-eng-review — one issue = one AskUserQuestion.
CEO review now detects UI scope and invokes the designer perspective
when the plan has frontend/UX work, so you get design review
automatically when it matters.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* test: validation + touchfile entries for 100% coverage
Add design-consultation to command/snapshot flag validation. Add 4
skills to contributor mode validation (plan-design-review,
design-review, design-consultation, document-release). Add 2 templates
to hardcoded branch check. Register touchfile entries for 10 new
LLM-judge tests and 1 new E2E test.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* test: LLM-judge for 10 skills + gstack-upgrade E2E
Add LLM-judge quality evals for all uncovered skills using a DRY
runWorkflowJudge helper with section marker guards. Add real E2E
test for gstack-upgrade using mock git remote (replaces test.todo).
Add plan-edit assertion to plan-design-review E2E.
14/15 skills now at full coverage. setup-browser-cookies remains
deferred (needs real browser).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: add bisect commit style to CLAUDE.md
All commits should be single logical changes, split before pushing.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* chore: bump version and changelog (v0.6.4.0)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
feat: cognitive patterns for plan-review skills (v0.6.2) (#141)
* feat: cognitive patterns for plan-review skills — latent space activation
Enrich /plan-ceo-review, /plan-eng-review, and /plan-design-review with
researched cognitive patterns from Bezos, Grove, Munger, Horowitz, Altman,
Rams, Norman, Zhuo, Gebbia, Larson, McKinley, Brooks, Beck, and Majors.
Patterns are evocative activation keys, not checklists — they trigger the
LLM's deep knowledge of how these people actually think.
* chore: bump version and changelog (v0.6.2.0)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
feat: Review Readiness Dashboard + gstack-slug helper (v0.5.1) (#130)
* feat: add bin/gstack-slug helper + migrate all inline SLUG computation
Extract the opaque SLUG sed pipeline into a shared 5-line shell script.
Replace 8 inline copies across templates with eval $(gstack-slug).
Sanitizes branch names (/ → -) to prevent subdirectory creation.
* feat: review readiness dashboard — track CEO/Eng/Design reviews per branch
Each review skill logs its result to JSONL. A shared {{REVIEW_DASHBOARD}}
placeholder displays run counts, timestamps, and a CLEARED TO SHIP verdict.
/ship pre-flight reads the dashboard and prompts when reviews are missing.
* chore: bump version and changelog (v0.5.1)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
feat: /plan-design-review + /qa-design-review skills (v0.5.0) (#102)
* feat: add {{DESIGN_METHODOLOGY}} resolver and register design review skills
Add generateDesignMethodology() to gen-skill-docs.ts with 10-category, 80-item
design audit checklist. Register plan-design-review and qa-design-review templates
in findTemplates(). Add both skills to skill-check.ts SKILL_FILES. Add command
and snapshot flag validation tests for both skills in skill-validation.test.ts.
* feat: add /plan-design-review and /qa-design-review skills
/plan-design-review: report-only designer audit with letter grades, AI slop
scoring, structured first impression, design system extraction, DESIGN.md
inference and export offer. Never modifies code.
/qa-design-review: same audit, then iterative fix loop with style(design):
commits, CSS-safe WTF heuristic, before/after screenshots, final re-audit.
* chore: bump version and changelog (v0.5.0)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: update README, ARCHITECTURE for design review skills (v0.5.0)
- Update skill count to 11, add /plan-design-review and /qa-design-review
to skill table, install/uninstall commands, and demo walkthrough
- Add narrative sections: "senior designer mode" and "designer who codes mode"
with compelling examples showing AI Slop detection and design system inference
- Add {{DESIGN_METHODOLOGY}} to ARCHITECTURE.md placeholder table
- Extend demo to show full plan→eng→review→ship→qa→design-review pipeline
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* chore: regenerate design review SKILL.md files after merge from main
Picks up BASE_BRANCH_DETECT resolver and updated contributor mode from main.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* feat: add /design-consultation skill — design consultant that creates DESIGN.md
6-phase consultant flow: product context → competitive research (WebSearch) →
complete coherent proposal → drill-downs on demand → font+color preview page →
write DESIGN.md + update CLAUDE.md. Opinionated recommendations grounded in
product context, not menu-driven forms.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* test: add E2E tests for design skill family (7 tests + LLM quality judge)
Tests 1-4: /design-consultation (core flow, research integration, existing
DESIGN.md handling, font+color preview generation).
Tests 5-6: /plan-design-review (audit report, DESIGN.md export).
Test 7: /qa-design-review (audit + fix loop).
LLM judge validates font blacklist compliance, coherence, and AI slop avoidance.
Also adds plan-design-review + qa-design-review to ALL_SKILLS test array.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* chore: mark /design-consultation as shipped in TODOS.md
Renamed from /setup-design-md to reflect the consultant approach.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>