~cytrogen/gstack

ref: 709bed9f4d7d419ef4f806f8b3e91fa53f6c0945 gstack/test/skill-e2e.test.ts -rw-r--r-- 120.8 KiB
ae2d8410 — Garry Tan a month ago
feat: adversarial spec review loop + skill chaining (v0.9.1.0) (#249)

* feat: add {{SPEC_REVIEW_LOOP}}, {{DESIGN_SKETCH}}, benefits-from resolvers

Three new resolvers in gen-skill-docs.ts:

- {{SPEC_REVIEW_LOOP}}: adversarial subagent reviews documents on 5
  dimensions (completeness, consistency, clarity, scope, feasibility)
  with convergence guard, quality score, and JSONL metrics
- {{DESIGN_SKETCH}}: generates rough HTML wireframes for UI ideas using
  DESIGN.md constraints and design principles, renders via $B
- {{BENEFITS_FROM}}: parses benefits-from frontmatter and generates
  skill chaining offer prose (one-hop-max, never blocks)

Also extends TemplateContext with benefitsFrom field and adds inline
YAML frontmatter parsing for the new field.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat: /office-hours spec review loop + visual sketch phases

- Phase 4.5 ({{DESIGN_SKETCH}}): for UI ideas, generates rough HTML
  wireframe using design principles from {{DESIGN_METHODOLOGY}} and
  DESIGN.md, renders via $B, presents screenshot for iteration
- Phase 5.5 ({{SPEC_REVIEW_LOOP}}): adversarial subagent reviews the
  design doc before user sees it — catches gaps in completeness,
  consistency, clarity, scope, and feasibility
- Adds {{BROWSE_SETUP}} for $B availability in sketch phase

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat: skill chaining — plan reviews offer /office-hours

- plan-ceo-review: benefits-from office-hours, offers /office-hours when
  no design doc found, mid-session detection when user seems lost,
  spec review loop on CEO plan documents
- plan-eng-review: benefits-from office-hours, offers /office-hours when
  no design doc found
- One-hop-max chaining: never blocks, max one offer per session

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test: add validation + E2E tests for spec review, sketch, benefits-from

Unit tests (32 new assertions):
- SPEC_REVIEW_LOOP: 5 dimensions, Agent dispatch, 3 iterations, quality
  score, metrics path, convergence guard, graceful failure
- DESIGN_SKETCH: DESIGN.md awareness, wireframe, $B goto/screenshot,
  rough aesthetic, skip conditions
- BENEFITS_FROM: prerequisite offer in CEO + eng review, graceful
  decline, skills without benefits-from don't get offer
- office-hours structure: spec review loop, adversarial dimensions,
  visual sketch section

E2E tests (2 new):
- office-hours-spec-review: verifies agent understands the spec review
  loop from SKILL.md
- plan-ceo-review-benefits: verifies agent understands the skill
  chaining offer

Touchfiles updated for diff-based test selection.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore: bump version and changelog (v0.9.1.0)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
d8523301 — Garry Tan a month ago
feat: /codex skill — multi-AI second opinion + proactive suggestions (#197)

* feat: /codex skill — multi-AI second opinion (review, challenge, consult)

Three modes: code review with pass/fail gate, adversarial challenge mode,
and conversational consult with session continuity. First multi-AI skill
in gstack, wrapping OpenAI's Codex CLI.

* feat: integrate /codex into /review, /ship, /plan-eng-review + dashboard

/review offers Codex second opinion after completing its own review.
/ship offers Codex review as optional gate before pushing.
/plan-eng-review offers Codex plan critique after scope challenge.
Review Readiness Dashboard shows Codex Review as optional row.

* chore: bump version and changelog (v0.8.0)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test: codex skill validation (12 stub tests) + E2E eval test

Stub tests (free tier): verify template content — three modes, gate verdict,
session continuity, cost tracking, cross-model comparison, binary discovery,
error handling, mktemp usage, and integrations into /review, /ship, /plan-eng-review.

E2E test (paid tier): runs /codex review on vulnerable fixture repo via
session-runner, verifies output contains findings and GATE verdict.

* fix: codex auth error message — use codex login, not OPENAI_API_KEY

Codex authenticates via ChatGPT OAuth (codex login), not an env var.

* feat: codex uses high reasoning effort by default

gpt-5.2-codex is the only model available with ChatGPT login.
All commands now use model_reasoning_effort="high" for maximum
depth — the whole point is a thorough second opinion.

* feat: crank codex reasoning to xhigh (maximum)

* feat: per-mode reasoning (high for review/consult, xhigh for challenge) + web search

Review and consult use high reasoning — thorough but not slow.
Challenge (adversarial) uses xhigh — maximum depth for breaking code.
All modes enable web_search_cached so Codex can look up docs/APIs.

* refactor: don't hardcode model — use codex default (always latest)

* feat: JSONL output for codex challenge + consult modes

Use --json flag to parse codex's JSONL events, extracting reasoning
traces ([codex thinking]), tool calls ([codex ran]), and token counts.
This gives richer output than the -o flag alone — you can see what
codex thought through before its answer.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: only persist codex-review log when code review actually ran

Don't write a codex-review entry to reviews.jsonl when only the
adversarial challenge (option B) was selected — there's no gate
verdict to record, and a false entry misleads the Review Readiness
Dashboard into thinking a code review happened.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat: add codex plan review option to /plan-eng-review

After scope challenge (Step 0), offer to have Codex independently
review the plan with a brutally honest tech reviewer persona.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test: update e2e test for codex skill

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: codex integration bugs — plan content, review persistence, quoting, stderr

- plan-eng-review: Codex now reads the plan file itself instead of inlining
  content as a CLI arg (avoids ARG_MAX for large plans)
- review: add missing echo to persist codex-review results to reviews.jsonl
- codex: consult mode uses $TMPERR (mktemp) instead of hardcoded stderr path
- codex + review: quote $SLUG/$BRANCH_SLUG in review log paths
- codex: scope plan lookup to current project, warn on cross-project fallback

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: add .context/ to .gitignore to prevent session ID leaks

Codex consult mode stores session IDs in .context/codex-session-id.
Without this ignore rule, session IDs could leak into commits.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat: proactive skill suggestions + opt-out + trigger phrase tests

- Preamble reads proactive config via gstack-config
- Root SKILL.md.tmpl has lifecycle map (stage → skill suggestion)
- Users can opt out ("stop suggesting") / opt in ("be proactive again")
- Restored trigger phrase validation tests (16 skills × "Use when" check)
- Added missing "Use when" trigger phrases to /debug and /office-hours

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore: update changelog for v0.8.0 — add proactive suggestions note

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
78c207ef — Garry Tan a month ago
feat: interactive /plan-design-review + CEO invokes designer + 100% coverage (v0.6.4) (#149)

* refactor: rename qa-design-review → design-review

The "qa-" prefix was confusing — this is the live-site design audit with
fix loop, not a QA-only report. Rename directory and update all references
across docs, tests, scripts, and skill templates.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat: interactive /plan-design-review + CEO invokes designer

Rewrite /plan-design-review from report-only grading to an interactive
plan-fixer that rates each design dimension 0-10, explains what a 10
looks like, and edits the plan to get there. Parallel structure with
/plan-ceo-review and /plan-eng-review — one issue = one AskUserQuestion.

CEO review now detects UI scope and invokes the designer perspective
when the plan has frontend/UX work, so you get design review
automatically when it matters.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test: validation + touchfile entries for 100% coverage

Add design-consultation to command/snapshot flag validation. Add 4
skills to contributor mode validation (plan-design-review,
design-review, design-consultation, document-release). Add 2 templates
to hardcoded branch check. Register touchfile entries for 10 new
LLM-judge tests and 1 new E2E test.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test: LLM-judge for 10 skills + gstack-upgrade E2E

Add LLM-judge quality evals for all uncovered skills using a DRY
runWorkflowJudge helper with section marker guards. Add real E2E
test for gstack-upgrade using mock git remote (replaces test.todo).
Add plan-edit assertion to plan-design-review E2E.

14/15 skills now at full coverage. setup-browser-cookies remains
deferred (needs real browser).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add bisect commit style to CLAUDE.md

All commits should be single logical changes, split before pushing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore: bump version and changelog (v0.6.4.0)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
28becb3b — Garry Tan a month ago
feat: design review lite in /review and /ship + gstack-diff-scope (v0.6.3) (#142)

* feat: gstack-diff-scope helper + design review checklist

bin/gstack-diff-scope categorizes branch changes into SCOPE_FRONTEND,
SCOPE_BACKEND, SCOPE_PROMPTS, SCOPE_TESTS, SCOPE_DOCS, SCOPE_CONFIG.

review/design-checklist.md is a 20-item code-level checklist with
HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW confidence tags for detecting design anti-patterns
from source code.

* feat: integrate design review lite into /review and /ship

Add generateDesignReviewLite() resolver, insert {{DESIGN_REVIEW_LITE}}
partial in review Step 4.5 and ship Step 3.5. Update dashboard to
recognize design-review-lite entries. Ship pre-flight uses
gstack-diff-scope for smarter design review recommendations.

* test: E2E eval for design review lite detection

Planted CSS/HTML fixtures with 7 design anti-patterns. E2E test
verifies /review catches >= 4 of 7 (Papyrus font, 14px body text,
outline:none, !important, purple gradient, generic hero copy,
3-column feature grid).

* chore: bump version and changelog (v0.6.3.0)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
17c1c06c — Garry Tan a month ago
feat: diff-based test selection for E2E and LLM-judge evals (v0.6.1.0) (#139)

* feat: diff-based test selection for E2E and LLM-judge evals

Each test declares file dependencies in a TOUCHFILES map. The test runner
checks git diff against the base branch and only runs tests whose
dependencies were modified. Global touchfiles (session-runner, eval-store,
gen-skill-docs) trigger all tests.

New scripts: test:e2e:all, test:evals:all, eval:select

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore: bump version and changelog (v0.6.1.0)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: plan-design-review-audit eval — bump turns to 30, add efficiency hints

The test was flaky at 20 turns because the agent reads a 300-line SKILL.md,
navigates, extracts design data, and writes a report. Added hints to skip
preamble/batch commands/write early while still testing the real SKILL.md.
Now completes in ~13 turns consistently.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
9d47619e — Garry Tan a month ago
feat: Completeness Principle — Boil the Lake (v0.6.1) (#140)

* feat: Completeness Principle — Boil the Lake (WIP, pre-merge)

Add Completeness Principle to all skill preambles, dual-time estimates,
compression table, anti-pattern gallery, Lake Score, and completeness
gaps review category. VERSION/CHANGELOG will be rebased after merge.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: update stale version reference in TODOS.md (v0.5.3 → v0.6.1)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: update CHANGELOG date + README for v0.6.1 features

- Add date to CHANGELOG 0.6.1 entry
- Add Completeness Principle to README intro
- Add SELECTIVE EXPANSION mode to CEO review section
- Add test bootstrap mention to /ship section
- Fix uninstall command missing design-consultation in project uninstall
- Add "recommends shortcuts" and "no tests" to Without gstack list

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: split README into lean intro + docs/ directory (gh CLI pattern)

README: 875 → 243 lines. Keeps intro, skill table, demo, install, and
troubleshooting. All per-skill deep dives, Greptile integration guide,
and contributor mode docs moved to docs/ directory.

- docs/skills.md — full philosophy and examples for all 13 skills
- docs/greptile.md — Greptile setup and triage workflow
- docs/contributor-mode.md — how to enable and use contributor mode
- README now links to docs/ via Documentation table
- Updated skill table entries with latest features (fix-first, regression
  tests, test health, completeness gaps)
- Updated demo transcript with AUTO-FIXED, coverage audit, regression test

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: remove "competitor" language, rewrite README in Garry's voice

Replace "browses competitors" with "knows the landscape" / "what's out
there" throughout all user-facing copy. Trim README from 243 to 167
lines — tighter, more opinionated, less listicle energy. Remove
Completeness Principle from README top (it lives in CLAUDE.md and the
skill preambles where Claude actually reads it).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: rewrite README in Garry's raw voice — AGI era, L8 factory, real stories

The README now sounds like Garry, not a product page. Leads with the
live experiment, the 16k LOC/day reality, the real-life coding stories
(Austin, hospital bedside). Highlights the newest unlocks (design at
the heart, /qa parallelism, smart review routing, test bootstrap).
Closes with an open invitation — free MIT, fork it, let's all ride
the wave together.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add Garry's bonafides to README intro — Palantir, Posterous, YC, 600k LOC

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add real /retro numbers — 140k lines, 362 commits across 3 projects

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add "in the last 60 days" timeframe to 600k LOC claim

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add GitHub contribution graphs — 2026 vs 2013 side by side

Same person, different era. 2013: 772 contributions building Bookface.
2026: 1,237 contributions and accelerating. The difference is the tooling.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: clarify /retro stats are from last 7 days

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add designer/PM/eng manager roles to intro

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: remove Josh/L8 reference from README

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: move demo up, make it dramatically more impressive

Show the actual architecture diagram, auto-fixed issues, 100% coverage,
regression test generation. Punch line: "That is not a copilot. That is
a team."

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: remove "My journey" section — intro already covers it

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: prefix all skill commands with You: in demo transcript

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: collapse You/Claude lines in demo — no gap between command and response

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: clarify plan mode flow in demo — approve, exit, Claude implements

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: move /ship to end of demo — review → QA → ship is the real flow

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add /plan-design-review to demo, tighten CEO response

Shorter CEO reply, compressed eng diagram, added design audit with
AI Slop score. Seven commands now: plan → eng → build → design →
review → QA → ship.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: move design review before implementation — it's part of planning

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: reorder demo — design before eng, after CEO

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: remove URL from /plan-design-review in demo

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add [...] annotations showing what actually happens at each step

Each step now shows what the agent does under the hood: 8 expansion
proposals cherry-picked, 80-item design audit, ASCII diagrams for
every flow, 2400 lines written in 8 minutes, real browser QA, bug
found and fixed. Makes the demo feel real, not abstract.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: rename Contributor Mode to How to Contribute in docs table

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add Coinbase, Instacart, Rippling to YC bonafides

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add "one or two people in a garage" to founder story

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add skill table to top of skills.md with anchor links

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: consolidate — roll contributor-mode into CONTRIBUTING, greptile into skills

- docs/contributor-mode.md → merged into CONTRIBUTING.md (session awareness section)
- docs/greptile.md → merged into docs/skills.md (Greptile integration section)
- Reordered docs table: Skills > Architecture > Browser > Contributing > Changelog

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
a2d756f9 — Garry Tan a month ago
feat: Test Bootstrap + Regression Tests + Coverage Audit (v0.6.0) (#136)

* feat: test bootstrap, regression tests, coverage audit, retro test health

- Add {{TEST_BOOTSTRAP}} resolver to gen-skill-docs.ts
- Add Phase 8e.5 regression test generation to /qa and /qa-design-review
- Add Step 3.4 test coverage audit with quality scoring to /ship
- Add test health tracking to /retro
- Add 2 E2E evals (bootstrap + coverage audit)
- Add 26 validation tests
- Update ARCHITECTURE.md placeholder table
- Add 2 P3 TODOs (CI/CD non-GitHub, auto-upgrade weak tests)

* chore: bump version and changelog (v0.6.0)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat: make coverage audit trace actual codepaths, not just syntax patterns

Step 3.4 now instructs Claude to read full files, trace data flow through
every branch, diagram the execution, and check each branch against tests.
Phase 8e.5 regression tests now trace the bug's codepath before writing
the test, catching adjacent edge cases.

* feat: coverage audit now maps user flows, interactions, and error states

Step 3.4 now covers the full picture: code branches AND user-facing behavior.
Maps user flows (complete journey through the feature), interaction edge cases
(double-click, back button, stale state, slow connection), error states
(what does the user actually see?), and boundary states (zero results,
10k results, max-length input). Coverage diagram splits into Code Path
Coverage and User Flow Coverage sections with separate percentages.

* fix: raise test gen cap to 20, add validation tests for user flow coverage

- Raise Step 3.4 test generation cap from 10 to 20 (code + user flow combined)
- Add 3 validation tests: codepath tracing, user flow mapping, diagram sections

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
b65a464d — Garry Tan a month ago
feat: always-full eng review + ship review gate persistence (v0.5.4) (#135)

Remove SMALL/BIG CHANGE menu from /plan-eng-review — every plan gets the
full interactive review. Scope reduction is now proactive (only when
complexity check triggers) rather than a menu item.

Add review gate override persistence to /ship — when the user says "ship
anyway" or "not relevant", that decision is saved to the branch's
reviews.jsonl so subsequent /ship runs don't re-ask.

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
5e9f0e78 — Garry Tan a month ago
feat: SELECTIVE EXPANSION + smarter ship gates (v0.5.3) (#134)

* feat: SELECTIVE EXPANSION mode + user control for CEO review

Add 4th mode to /plan-ceo-review: SELECTIVE EXPANSION holds current scope
as baseline but surfaces expansion opportunities one by one for cherry-picking.
All modes now present every scope-expanding idea as individual AskUserQuestion
calls — user opts in or out of each one. EXPANSION recommends enthusiastically,
SELECTIVE recommends neutrally. CEO plan persistence writes decisions to disk.

* feat: review dashboard — eng required, CEO/design optional

Only Eng Review gates shipping. CEO Review recommended for big product
changes, Design Review for UI work — both informational only. Adds
skip_eng_review global config to disable the gate entirely.

* chore: bump version and changelog (v0.5.3)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
4a77cc2c — Garry Tan a month ago
feat: /plan-design-review + /qa-design-review skills (v0.5.0) (#102)

* feat: add {{DESIGN_METHODOLOGY}} resolver and register design review skills

Add generateDesignMethodology() to gen-skill-docs.ts with 10-category, 80-item
design audit checklist. Register plan-design-review and qa-design-review templates
in findTemplates(). Add both skills to skill-check.ts SKILL_FILES. Add command
and snapshot flag validation tests for both skills in skill-validation.test.ts.

* feat: add /plan-design-review and /qa-design-review skills

/plan-design-review: report-only designer audit with letter grades, AI slop
scoring, structured first impression, design system extraction, DESIGN.md
inference and export offer. Never modifies code.

/qa-design-review: same audit, then iterative fix loop with style(design):
commits, CSS-safe WTF heuristic, before/after screenshots, final re-audit.

* chore: bump version and changelog (v0.5.0)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: update README, ARCHITECTURE for design review skills (v0.5.0)

- Update skill count to 11, add /plan-design-review and /qa-design-review
  to skill table, install/uninstall commands, and demo walkthrough
- Add narrative sections: "senior designer mode" and "designer who codes mode"
  with compelling examples showing AI Slop detection and design system inference
- Add {{DESIGN_METHODOLOGY}} to ARCHITECTURE.md placeholder table
- Extend demo to show full plan→eng→review→ship→qa→design-review pipeline

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore: regenerate design review SKILL.md files after merge from main

Picks up BASE_BRANCH_DETECT resolver and updated contributor mode from main.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat: add /design-consultation skill — design consultant that creates DESIGN.md

6-phase consultant flow: product context → competitive research (WebSearch) →
complete coherent proposal → drill-downs on demand → font+color preview page →
write DESIGN.md + update CLAUDE.md. Opinionated recommendations grounded in
product context, not menu-driven forms.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test: add E2E tests for design skill family (7 tests + LLM quality judge)

Tests 1-4: /design-consultation (core flow, research integration, existing
DESIGN.md handling, font+color preview generation).
Tests 5-6: /plan-design-review (audit report, DESIGN.md export).
Test 7: /qa-design-review (audit + fix loop).
LLM judge validates font blacklist compliance, coherence, and AI slop avoidance.
Also adds plan-design-review + qa-design-review to ALL_SKILLS test array.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore: mark /design-consultation as shipped in TODOS.md

Renamed from /setup-design-md to reflect the consultant approach.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
a68244ab — Garry Tan a month ago
feat: /document-release skill — post-ship doc updates (v0.4.3) (#109)

* docs: update project documentation for v0.4.2

- README: skill count 9→10, added /document-release to skills table,
  install/uninstall sections, and dedicated section with example
- CHANGELOG: added /document-release bullet to v0.4.2 entry

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat: add /document-release skill with smart VERSION handling

New skill runs after /ship but before PR merge. Reads every doc file,
cross-references the diff, auto-updates factual changes, asks about
risky edits. CHANGELOG clobber protection: never uses Write tool on
CHANGELOG.md, only Edit with exact old_string matches.

Smart VERSION logic: instead of silently skipping already-bumped
versions, compares CHANGELOG entry scope against full diff and asks
if significant uncovered changes exist.

Also fixes gstack-upgrade/SKILL.md missing from skill-check.ts
SKILL_FILES array (existing inconsistency with gen-skill-docs.ts).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat: /review Step 5.6 — documentation staleness check

Review skill now cross-references code changes against doc files.
If a doc describes a feature that changed but the doc wasn't updated,
flags it as INFORMATIONAL with a pointer to /document-release.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test: /document-release E2E with CHANGELOG clobber guard

E2E test creates a repo with existing CHANGELOG entries, runs
/document-release, and asserts original entries survive. Critical
guardrail against the incident where an agent replaced CHANGELOG
entries during conflict resolution.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore: bump to v0.4.3 — /document-release skill

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore: regenerate SKILL.md files after merge

* chore: regenerate SKILL.md files after merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
78e519e3 — Garry Tan a month ago
feat: await support in browse js/eval + contributor mode v2 (#104)

* feat: support await in $B js and eval commands

Auto-wrap await expressions in async IIFE context so
$B js "await fetch(...)" works without SyntaxError.

- hasAwait() strips comments before detection
- js: expression wrapping (async()=>(expr))()
- eval: smart wrapping — single-line=expression, multi-line=block
- 6 new unit tests covering async, false-positive, and return semantics

* feat: redesign contributor mode — periodic reflection with 0-10 rating

Replace passive "report when things break" with active reflection:
- Rate gstack experience 0-10 at workflow step boundaries
- Historical calibration example (await bug) anchors the reporting bar
- "What would make this a 10" field focuses on actionable improvements
- Removed category lists in favor of judgment-based assessment

* test: add deterministic contributor mode preamble validation

40 new skill-validation tests (4 checks × 10 skills) verify:
- 0-10 rating scale present
- Calibration example present
- "What would make this a 10" field present
- Periodic reflection (not per-command)

Update existing E2E contributor eval for new report format.

* chore: bump version and changelog (v0.4.2)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: improve contributor mode + qa-quick E2E reliability

Contributor mode:
- Add "do not truncate" directive to template — agent was stopping
  after "My rating" without completing Steps/Raw output/What would
  make this a 10 sections
- Restore assertions for Steps to reproduce and Date footer

QA quick:
- Make test server URL prominent: top of prompt, explicit "already
  running" and "do NOT discover ports" instructions
- Bump session timeout 180s→240s and test timeout 240s→300s
- Set B= at top of prompt (was buried in prose)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: use flexible assertions for contributor mode E2E

Agent writes thorough reports with creative section names
("Repro Steps" vs "Steps to reproduce"). Match intent not formatting:
- /repro|steps to reproduce/ for reproduction steps
- /date.*2026/ for date footer presence

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add E2E eval failure blame protocol

"Not related to our changes" is an extraordinary claim that requires
extraordinary proof. When evals fail during /ship:

1. Run the same eval on main — prove it fails there too
2. If it passes on main, it IS your change — trace the blame
3. If you can't verify, say "unverified" not "pre-existing"

Added to CLAUDE.md and as a comment in skill-e2e.test.ts.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: update CONTRIBUTING.md and BROWSER.md for v0.4.2

CONTRIBUTING.md: update contributor mode description — now describes
periodic 0-10 reflection loop instead of passive friction detection.

BROWSER.md: add js/eval async documentation — await expressions are
auto-wrapped in async context, single-line eval returns values directly.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: restore v0.4.2 changelog entries lost during cherry-pick conflict

The base branch detection entries from main were dropped when resolving
the CHANGELOG conflict — should have merged both sets, not replaced.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
1e06b6a5 — Garry Tan a month ago
fix: dynamic base branch detection across all SKILL templates (v0.3.10) (#81)

* feat: add {{BASE_BRANCH_DETECT}} resolver to gen-skill-docs

DRY placeholder for dynamic base branch detection across PR-targeting
skills. Detects via gh pr view (existing PR base) → gh repo view
(repo default) → fallback to main.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: ship skill detects base branch instead of hardcoding main

Replaces ~14 hardcoded 'main' references with dynamic detection via
{{BASE_BRANCH_DETECT}}. Fixes stacked branches and Conductor workspaces
targeting non-main branches. Adds --base <base> to gh pr create.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: review, qa, plan-ceo-review detect base branch dynamically

Same pattern as ship: replaces hardcoded 'main' with {{BASE_BRANCH_DETECT}}.
Also cleans up qa bash-isms (REPORT_DIR variable, port chaining).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: retro detects default branch instead of hardcoding origin/main

Retro queries commit history (not PR targets), so uses simpler detection:
gh repo view defaultBranchRef. Replaces ~11 origin/main refs with
origin/<default>.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add explicit cross-step references in gstack-upgrade template

Bash blocks are self-contained, but cross-block variable references
(INSTALL_DIR from Step 2) were implicit. Adds prose making them explicit.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs+test: SKILL authoring guidance + regression tests

Adds "Writing SKILL templates" section to CLAUDE.md explaining that
templates are prompts, not scripts. Adds validation test catching
hardcoded 'main' in git commands, and resolver content test.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: update ARCHITECTURE + CONTRIBUTING for new placeholders

Add {{BASE_BRANCH_DETECT}} to ARCHITECTURE.md placeholder list.
Cross-reference CLAUDE.md template authoring guidance from CONTRIBUTING.md.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore: bump version and changelog (v0.3.10)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: add missing blank line between resolver functions

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test: add 3 E2E smoke tests for base branch detection

- /review: verifies Step 0 detection + git diff against detected base
- /ship: truncated dry-run (Steps 0-1 only, no push/PR), asserts no
  destructive actions
- /retro: verifies default branch detection for git log queries

Covers the {{BASE_BRANCH_DETECT}} resolver path (review), the ship
template's dual abort check, and retro's inline detection pattern.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore: bump version and changelog (v0.4.2)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
3e3843c4 — Garry Tan a month ago
feat: contributor mode, session awareness, recommendation format (#90)

* feat: contributor mode, session awareness, universal RECOMMENDATION format

- Rename {{UPDATE_CHECK}} → {{PREAMBLE}} across all 10 skill templates
- Add session tracking (touch ~/.gstack/sessions/$PPID, count active sessions)
- ELI16 mode when 3+ concurrent sessions detected (re-ground user on context)
- Contributor mode: auto-file field reports to ~/.gstack/contributor-logs/
- Universal AskUserQuestion format: context → question → RECOMMENDATION → options
- Update plan-ceo-review and plan-eng-review to reference preamble baseline
- Add vendored symlink awareness section to CLAUDE.md
- Rewrite CONTRIBUTING.md with contributor workflow and cross-project testing
- Add tests for contributor mode and session awareness in generated output
- Add E2E eval for contributor mode report filing

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat: add Enum & Value Completeness to /review critical checklist

New CRITICAL review category that traces new enum values, status strings,
and type constants through every consumer outside the diff. Catches the
class of bugs where a new value is added but not handled in all switch/case
chains, allowlists, or frontend-backend contracts.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore: bump v0.4.1, user-facing changelog, update qa-only template and architecture docs

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add CHANGELOG style guide — user-facing, sell the feature

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: rewrite v0.4.1 changelog to be user-facing and sell the features

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat: add evals for RECOMMENDATION format, session awareness, and enum completeness

Free tests (Tier 1): RECOMMENDATION format + session awareness in all
preamble SKILL.md files, enum completeness checklist structure and CRITICAL
classification.

E2E eval: /review catches missed enum handlers when a new status value
is added but not handled in case/switch and notify methods.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat: add E2E eval for session awareness ELI16 mode

Stubs _SESSIONS=4, gives agent a decision point on feature/add-payments
branch, verifies the output re-grounds the user with project, branch,
context, and RECOMMENDATION — the ELI16 mode behavior for 3+ sessions.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: contributor mode eval marked FAIL due to expected browse error

The test intentionally runs a nonexistent binary to trigger contributor
mode. The session runner's browse error detection catches "no such file
or directory...browse" and sets browseErrors, causing recordE2E to mark
passed=false. Override passed to check only exitReason since the browse
error is the expected scenario.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
f3ee0ee2 — Garry Tan a month ago
feat: QA restructure, browser ref staleness, eval efficiency metrics (v0.4.0) (#83)

* feat: browser ref staleness detection via async count() validation

resolveRef() now checks element count to detect stale refs after page
mutations (e.g. SPA navigation). RefEntry stores role+name metadata
for better diagnostics. 3 new snapshot tests for staleness detection.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat: qa-only skill, qa fix loop, plan-to-QA artifact flow

Add /qa-only (report-only, Edit tool blocked), restructure /qa with
find-fix-verify cycle, add {{QA_METHODOLOGY}} DRY placeholder for
shared methodology. /plan-eng-review now writes test-plan artifacts
to ~/.gstack/projects/<slug>/ for QA consumption.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat: eval efficiency metrics — turns, duration, commentary across all surfaces

Add generateCommentary() for natural-language delta interpretation,
per-test turns/duration in comparison and summary output, judgePassed
unit tests, 3 new E2E tests (qa-only, qa fix loop, plan artifact).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore: bump version and changelog (v0.4.0)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: update ARCHITECTURE, BROWSER, CONTRIBUTING, README for v0.4.0

- ARCHITECTURE: add ref staleness detection section, update RefEntry type
- BROWSER: add ref staleness paragraph to snapshot system docs
- CONTRIBUTING: update eval tool descriptions with commentary feature
- README: fix missing qa-only in project-local uninstall command

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add user-facing benefit descriptions to v0.4.0 changelog

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
0ac7ef4e — Garry Tan a month ago
fix: harden planted-bug eval prompt for reliable form testing

Phase 3 was too vague ("click every nav link") causing the agent to
wander instead of systematically testing form fields. Now explicitly
directs: fill every input, clear it, try invalid values, submit and
check console. Added Phase 4 finalize step to ensure report is updated
with all findings.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
7d266661 — Garry Tan a month ago
Merge pull request #55 from garrytan/v0.3.6-qa-upgrades

feat: E2E observability + eval infrastructure + all skills templated
9f5aa32e — Garry Tan a month ago
fix: fail fast on API connectivity — pre-check before E2E suite

Spawn a quick claude -p ping before running 13 tests. If the Anthropic API
is unreachable (ConnectionRefused), throw immediately instead of burning
through the entire suite with silent false passes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
510a8d8d — Garry Tan a month ago
feat: wire runId + testName + diagnostics through all E2E tests

Generate per-session runId, pass testName + runId to every runSkillTest() call,
wire exit_reason/timeout_at_turn/last_tool_call through recordE2E(). Add
eval:watch script entry to package.json.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
eb9a9193 — Garry Tan a month ago
fix: plan-ceo-review timeout — init git repo, skip codebase exploration, bump to 420s

The CEO review SKILL.md has a "System Audit" step that runs git commands.
In an empty tmpdir without a git repo, the agent wastes turns exploring.
Fix: init minimal git repo, tell agent to skip codebase exploration,
bump test timeouts to 420s for all review/retro tests.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Next