feat: Completeness Principle — Boil the Lake (v0.6.1) (#140)
* feat: Completeness Principle — Boil the Lake (WIP, pre-merge)
Add Completeness Principle to all skill preambles, dual-time estimates,
compression table, anti-pattern gallery, Lake Score, and completeness
gaps review category. VERSION/CHANGELOG will be rebased after merge.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix: update stale version reference in TODOS.md (v0.5.3 → v0.6.1)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: update CHANGELOG date + README for v0.6.1 features
- Add date to CHANGELOG 0.6.1 entry
- Add Completeness Principle to README intro
- Add SELECTIVE EXPANSION mode to CEO review section
- Add test bootstrap mention to /ship section
- Fix uninstall command missing design-consultation in project uninstall
- Add "recommends shortcuts" and "no tests" to Without gstack list
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: split README into lean intro + docs/ directory (gh CLI pattern)
README: 875 → 243 lines. Keeps intro, skill table, demo, install, and
troubleshooting. All per-skill deep dives, Greptile integration guide,
and contributor mode docs moved to docs/ directory.
- docs/skills.md — full philosophy and examples for all 13 skills
- docs/greptile.md — Greptile setup and triage workflow
- docs/contributor-mode.md — how to enable and use contributor mode
- README now links to docs/ via Documentation table
- Updated skill table entries with latest features (fix-first, regression
tests, test health, completeness gaps)
- Updated demo transcript with AUTO-FIXED, coverage audit, regression test
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: remove "competitor" language, rewrite README in Garry's voice
Replace "browses competitors" with "knows the landscape" / "what's out
there" throughout all user-facing copy. Trim README from 243 to 167
lines — tighter, more opinionated, less listicle energy. Remove
Completeness Principle from README top (it lives in CLAUDE.md and the
skill preambles where Claude actually reads it).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: rewrite README in Garry's raw voice — AGI era, L8 factory, real stories
The README now sounds like Garry, not a product page. Leads with the
live experiment, the 16k LOC/day reality, the real-life coding stories
(Austin, hospital bedside). Highlights the newest unlocks (design at
the heart, /qa parallelism, smart review routing, test bootstrap).
Closes with an open invitation — free MIT, fork it, let's all ride
the wave together.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: add Garry's bonafides to README intro — Palantir, Posterous, YC, 600k LOC
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: add real /retro numbers — 140k lines, 362 commits across 3 projects
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: add "in the last 60 days" timeframe to 600k LOC claim
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: add GitHub contribution graphs — 2026 vs 2013 side by side
Same person, different era. 2013: 772 contributions building Bookface.
2026: 1,237 contributions and accelerating. The difference is the tooling.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: clarify /retro stats are from last 7 days
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: add designer/PM/eng manager roles to intro
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: remove Josh/L8 reference from README
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: move demo up, make it dramatically more impressive
Show the actual architecture diagram, auto-fixed issues, 100% coverage,
regression test generation. Punch line: "That is not a copilot. That is
a team."
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: remove "My journey" section — intro already covers it
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: prefix all skill commands with You: in demo transcript
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: collapse You/Claude lines in demo — no gap between command and response
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: clarify plan mode flow in demo — approve, exit, Claude implements
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: move /ship to end of demo — review → QA → ship is the real flow
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: add /plan-design-review to demo, tighten CEO response
Shorter CEO reply, compressed eng diagram, added design audit with
AI Slop score. Seven commands now: plan → eng → build → design →
review → QA → ship.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: move design review before implementation — it's part of planning
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: reorder demo — design before eng, after CEO
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: remove URL from /plan-design-review in demo
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: add [...] annotations showing what actually happens at each step
Each step now shows what the agent does under the hood: 8 expansion
proposals cherry-picked, 80-item design audit, ASCII diagrams for
every flow, 2400 lines written in 8 minutes, real browser QA, bug
found and fixed. Makes the demo feel real, not abstract.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: rename Contributor Mode to How to Contribute in docs table
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: add Coinbase, Instacart, Rippling to YC bonafides
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: add "one or two people in a garage" to founder story
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: add skill table to top of skills.md with anchor links
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: consolidate — roll contributor-mode into CONTRIBUTING, greptile into skills
- docs/contributor-mode.md → merged into CONTRIBUTING.md (session awareness section)
- docs/greptile.md → merged into docs/skills.md (Greptile integration section)
- Reordered docs table: Skills > Architecture > Browser > Contributing > Changelog
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
feat: /design-consultation — risk-taking, visual research, ambitious preview (v0.5.2) (#131)
* feat: /design-consultation — risk-taking thesis, visual research, ambitious preview
Add SAFE/RISK breakdown to design proposals so users see which choices
match category conventions vs. which are deliberate creative departures.
Wire browse binary for visual competitive research — agent browses
competitor sites, takes screenshots, and analyzes fonts/colors/spacing
with graceful degradation to WebSearch-only or built-in knowledge.
Upgrade preview page instructions to render realistic product mockups
(dashboards, marketing pages, settings forms) instead of just swatches.
Rewrite README section with the thesis: "coherence is table stakes —
the real question is where you take risks."
* chore: bump version and changelog (v0.5.2)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix: restore SKILL.md files to match main
Prior commit included SKILL.md files regenerated from stale templates.
Restore to match origin/main content.
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
feat: /plan-design-review + /qa-design-review skills (v0.5.0) (#102)
* feat: add {{DESIGN_METHODOLOGY}} resolver and register design review skills
Add generateDesignMethodology() to gen-skill-docs.ts with 10-category, 80-item
design audit checklist. Register plan-design-review and qa-design-review templates
in findTemplates(). Add both skills to skill-check.ts SKILL_FILES. Add command
and snapshot flag validation tests for both skills in skill-validation.test.ts.
* feat: add /plan-design-review and /qa-design-review skills
/plan-design-review: report-only designer audit with letter grades, AI slop
scoring, structured first impression, design system extraction, DESIGN.md
inference and export offer. Never modifies code.
/qa-design-review: same audit, then iterative fix loop with style(design):
commits, CSS-safe WTF heuristic, before/after screenshots, final re-audit.
* chore: bump version and changelog (v0.5.0)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: update README, ARCHITECTURE for design review skills (v0.5.0)
- Update skill count to 11, add /plan-design-review and /qa-design-review
to skill table, install/uninstall commands, and demo walkthrough
- Add narrative sections: "senior designer mode" and "designer who codes mode"
with compelling examples showing AI Slop detection and design system inference
- Add {{DESIGN_METHODOLOGY}} to ARCHITECTURE.md placeholder table
- Extend demo to show full plan→eng→review→ship→qa→design-review pipeline
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* chore: regenerate design review SKILL.md files after merge from main
Picks up BASE_BRANCH_DETECT resolver and updated contributor mode from main.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* feat: add /design-consultation skill — design consultant that creates DESIGN.md
6-phase consultant flow: product context → competitive research (WebSearch) →
complete coherent proposal → drill-downs on demand → font+color preview page →
write DESIGN.md + update CLAUDE.md. Opinionated recommendations grounded in
product context, not menu-driven forms.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* test: add E2E tests for design skill family (7 tests + LLM quality judge)
Tests 1-4: /design-consultation (core flow, research integration, existing
DESIGN.md handling, font+color preview generation).
Tests 5-6: /plan-design-review (audit report, DESIGN.md export).
Test 7: /qa-design-review (audit + fix loop).
LLM judge validates font blacklist compliance, coherence, and AI slop avoidance.
Also adds plan-design-review + qa-design-review to ALL_SKILLS test array.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* chore: mark /design-consultation as shipped in TODOS.md
Renamed from /setup-design-md to reflect the consultant approach.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>