Shared reference for fetching, filtering, and classifying Greptile review comments on GitHub PRs. Both /review (Step 2.5) and /ship (Step 3.75) reference this document.
Run these commands to detect the PR and fetch comments. Both API calls run in parallel.
REPO=$(gh repo view --json nameWithOwner --jq '.nameWithOwner' 2>/dev/null)
PR_NUMBER=$(gh pr view --json number --jq '.number' 2>/dev/null)
If either fails or is empty: Skip Greptile triage silently. This integration is additive — the workflow works without it.
# Fetch line-level review comments AND top-level PR comments in parallel
gh api repos/$REPO/pulls/$PR_NUMBER/comments \
--jq '.[] | select(.user.login == "greptile-apps[bot]") | select(.position != null) | {id: .id, path: .path, line: .line, body: .body, html_url: .html_url, source: "line-level"}' > /tmp/greptile_line.json &
gh api repos/$REPO/issues/$PR_NUMBER/comments \
--jq '.[] | select(.user.login == "greptile-apps[bot]") | {id: .id, body: .body, html_url: .html_url, source: "top-level"}' > /tmp/greptile_top.json &
wait
If API errors or zero Greptile comments across both endpoints: Skip silently.
The position != null filter on line-level comments automatically skips outdated comments from force-pushed code.
Read ~/.gstack/greptile-history.md if it exists. Each line records a previous triage outcome:
<date> | <repo> | <type:fp|fix|already-fixed> | <file-pattern> | <category>
Categories (fixed set): race-condition, null-check, error-handling, style, type-safety, security, performance, correctness, other
Match each fetched comment against entries where:
type == fp (only suppress known false positives, not previously fixed real issues)repo matches the current repofile-pattern matches the comment's file pathcategory matches the issue type in the commentSkip matched comments as SUPPRESSED.
If the history file doesn't exist or has unparseable lines, skip those lines and continue — never fail on a malformed history file.
For each non-suppressed comment:
path:line and surrounding context (±10 lines)git diff origin/main) and the review checklistWhen replying to Greptile comments, use the correct endpoint based on comment source:
Line-level comments (from pulls/$PR/comments):
gh api repos/$REPO/pulls/$PR_NUMBER/comments/$COMMENT_ID/replies \
-f body="<reply text>"
Top-level comments (from issues/$PR/comments):
gh api repos/$REPO/issues/$PR_NUMBER/comments \
-f body="<reply text>"
If a reply POST fails (e.g., PR was closed, no write permission): warn and continue. Do not stop the workflow for a failed reply.
Before writing, ensure the directory exists:
mkdir -p ~/.gstack
Append one line per triage outcome to ~/.gstack/greptile-history.md:
<YYYY-MM-DD> | <owner/repo> | <type> | <file-pattern> | <category>
Example entries:
2026-03-13 | garrytan/myapp | fp | app/services/auth_service.rb | race-condition
2026-03-13 | garrytan/myapp | fix | app/models/user.rb | null-check
2026-03-13 | garrytan/myapp | already-fixed | lib/payments.rb | error-handling
Include a Greptile summary in the output header:
+ N Greptile comments (X valid, Y fixed, Z FP)
For each classified comment, show:
[VALID], [FIXED], [FALSE POSITIVE], [SUPPRESSED][top-level] (for top-level)html_url field)